International Fintech UAB
London, UK
Fintechs’ negligence in UBO compliance invites crushing fines, lawsuits, and customer backlash. This reckless approach undermines trust and stability, marking these firms as risky and unreliable.
1.6/5
Trust Score
Composite score based on public data signals and verifiability indicators.
2
Red Flags
The dossier on International Fintech UAB has been compiled using publicly available sources including court records, regulatory filings, corporate registries, archived media reports, and other verifiable documents. Research is conducted in collaboration with journalists, OSINT analysts, researchers, and citizen contributors.
The information presented is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a legal determination regarding International Fintech UAB. We welcome credible evidence, corrections, or additional documentation that may help improve the accuracy and completeness of this record.
Created: April 22, 2025 • Updated: February 5, 2026
International Fintech UAB, once a licensed electronic money institution in Lithuania, has faced significant regulatory and operational challenges leading to its license revocation. The company, associated with Israeli entrepreneurs Eyal Nachum and Tamir Zoltovsky, has been linked to previous compliance issues in the fintech sector.
License Revocation by Bank of Lithuania: In July 2020, the Bank of Lithuania revoked International Fintech UAB’s electronic money institution license. The revocation was part of broader regulatory scrutiny over compliance practices within the fintech industry.
Association with Controversial Business Practices: The company has been linked to other entities facing regulatory challenges, raising concerns about the business practices of its founders. These associations have contributed to the company’s tarnished reputation in the fintech sector.
Involvement in Legal Disputes: Legal disputes involving the company’s founders have been reported, including defamation cases related to their business activities. Such disputes have further complicated the company’s public image and investor confidence.
Customer Complaints and Service Disruptions: Following the license revocation, customers reported difficulties in accessing services and retrieving funds. These issues have highlighted challenges in customer service and operational continuity.
Limited Public Communication: The company has provided minimal public communication regarding the reasons for its license revocation and subsequent actions. This lack of transparency has contributed to uncertainty among stakeholders.
International Fintech UAB’s license revocation and its founders’ associations with controversial business practices have led to significant reputational challenges. The company’s involvement in legal disputes, customer service issues, and limited public communication have compounded concerns, highlighting the importance of regulatory compliance and transparency in the fintech industry.
Compliance and Regulatory Intel
| Risk Category | Assessment Question | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Liabilities | Does have any significant outstanding liabilities that may pose financial risks? | Not Known |
| Undisclosed Relations | Are there undisclosed business relationships or affiliations linked to ? | Possibly Yes |
| Sanctions or Watchlist Matches | Is listed on any international sanctions or compliance watchlists? | Possibly Yes |
| Criminal Record | Does have a record of criminal activity or related investigations? | Possibly Yes |
| Civil Lawsuits | Are there civil lawsuits, past or present, involving ? | Definitely Yes |
| Regulatory Violations | Has faced regulatory violations or penalties? | Not Known |
| Bankruptcy History | Has filed for bankruptcy or been involved in any bankruptcy proceedings? | Definitely Yes |
| Adverse Media Mentions | Have there been significant adverse media mentions related to ? | Potentially No |
| Negative Customer Reviews | Are there negative reviews or complaints from customers or clients about ? | Possibly Yes |
| High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure | Does operate within or have exposure to high-risk jurisdictions? | Not Known |
| Ongoing Investigations | Is currently subject to any ongoing investigations? | Definitely Yes |
| Fraud or Scam Allegations | Have there been fraud or scam allegations involving ? | Definitely Yes |
| Reputational Risk Incidents | Have there been incidents significantly impacting ’s reputation? | Definitely Yes |
| High-Risk Business Activities | Is engaged in any high-risk business activities? | Possibly Yes |
Our Research Methodology
Sources, verification, and research standards behind our reports.
Public Records Review
LegalObserver analyzes verifiable public records including court filings, regulatory disclosures, enforcement actions, corporate registries, and government databases. Each entry links to original documentation whenever possible to allow independent verification.
Court Filings & Litigation
We examine civil, criminal, and regulatory proceedings involving the subject. This includes lawsuits, judgments, settlements, injunctions, and other documented litigation history obtained from court databases and legal archives.
Corporate & Ownership Data
Corporate filings, director records, shareholder disclosures, and beneficial ownership data are reviewed to identify business affiliations, control structures, and related entities.
Regulatory & Compliance Records
We review enforcement notices, regulatory actions, sanctions listings, compliance warnings, and disciplinary records issued by financial, governmental, and professional authorities.
Media & Archive Research
Coverage from established news organizations, investigative journalism outlets, and archived publications is analyzed to document historical reporting and public narratives associated with the subject.
OSINT Intelligence
Open-source intelligence techniques are used to gather and cross-reference information from publicly accessible sources including corporate registries, official disclosures, archived webpages, and investigative databases.
Censorship & Takedown Monitoring
LegalObserver documents verified attempts to suppress or remove public information, including questionable copyright claims, takedown notices, or legal threats directed at publishers or archives.
Risk & Context Analysis
All verified information is evaluated for context and relevance. The goal is to present documented facts, legal developments, and historical records in a structured format that helps readers understand potential legal, reputational, or compliance risks.
Internet Archives and Screenshots
About us
- LegalObserver publishes investigative dossiers compiled from publicly available sources including court records, regulatory filings, corporate registries, and archived media reports.
- Our research is conducted in collaboration with journalists, OSINT analysts, researchers, and citizen contributors who review and cross-reference verifiable information.
- We publish information for research and public interest purposes and welcome credible evidence, corrections, or additional documentation that may improve the accuracy of our records.
Source of Information
- 1 FinTelegram Breaking News – Notorious International Fintech no longer has a Lithuanian EMI license Retrieved 07/09/2020
Access the Full Intelligence Network
Create a free account to unlock extended dossiers, investigation updates, archive records, and community intelligence. Upgrade for advanced research tools, alerts, and premium investigative reports.
Upgrade to Pro for $10/month
Oren Shabat Laurent
Tel Aviv, Israel
Intel Reports
3
Trust Score
2.1
Coinbase
Wilmington, Delaware
Intel Reports
0
Trust Score
1.9
User Feedback
Public feedback and intelligence submitted by readers and researchers
2.3
Average Ratings
Based on 2 Ratings
Add Feedback
Your feedback helps improve our platform and service
The way International Fintech UAB handled everything was ridiculous. License revoked, customers left hanging, founders like Eyal Nachum involved in other risky stuff. I mean, you can’t just ignore regulations and expect people to trust you. Complete mess.
Can’t believe how shady International Fintech UAB turned out to be. Eyal Nachum being linked to multiple controversial practices doesn’t help at all. People trying to use their services faced so many issues, and they just ghosted their clients. Not reliable at all.