Listed under Criminal

Jocelyn Grégoire

Canada

Jocelyn Grégoire and Cedma Finance have been ordered to halt all mortgage and securities-related activities by Quebec’s financial regulator due to unregistered operations and potential threats to public safety.

1.6/5

Trust Score

Composite score based on public data signals and verifiability indicators.

2

Red Flags

CONTACT INFO

  • City:
  • Québec
  • State:
  • Québec
  • Country:
  • Canada
  • Phone:
  • (514) 316-6421
Enhance this Profile

Submit Critical Intel on Jocelyn Grégoire and win upto $1000 in Reward!

3 Tips Under Review

SUBMIT ANONYMOUS TIP

Jocelyn Grégoire built a flashy image as a real estate and media personality in Quebec, but today his name is linked more to lawsuits, asset freezes, and public anger than to success. Behind the polished brand of Les Mordus d’Immobilier lies a record of unfinished projects, hidden deals, and angry investors. What once looked like a thriving empire now appears riddled with deception and broken promises.

Hidden Ownership Games
Grégoire set up a maze of numbered companies and offshore firms in Panama and the British Virgin Islands, making it nearly impossible to track who really controls the money. This secrecy fuels suspicion that the setup wasn’t about business efficiency but about hiding questionable financial moves.

Assets Frozen by Court
A Quebec court froze Grégoire’s bank accounts and over 30 properties after a $7.8 million fraud lawsuit linked to his Crackboom venture. Judges went as far as to highlight “bad faith” behavior, a rare and damning warning that suggests his empire may have been built on lies.

Investors Left in Ruin
Dozens of buyers and retirees say they were misled with inflated property values and empty promises of developments that never got finished. People lost their savings while Grégoire avoided accountability, showing a disturbing pattern of taking money and abandoning clients.

Media Turns Against Him
Once celebrated, Grégoire is now portrayed by local media as a “smooth-talking swindler.” His attempts to silence critics—like deleting negative comments—have only fueled the backlash. The public now sees him less as a business leader and more as a manipulator hiding from the truth.

Regulators Watching Closely
Quebec’s financial regulators are reportedly investigating his activities, raising serious red flags. Even without criminal charges yet, the lawsuits and injunctions suggest a ticking time bomb. His entire business model is being treated as something that could collapse under scrutiny.

Jocelyn Grégoire is no longer seen as a rising star in Quebec real estate but as a man tied to lawsuits, frozen assets, and broken promises. Investors, courts, and regulators are circling, while ordinary people count their losses. His empire is now a warning sign for anyone tempted to trust him, and his public image is beyond repair.

Compliance and Regulatory Intel

Risk Category Assessment Question Status
Liabilities Does have any significant outstanding liabilities that may pose financial risks? Definitely Yes
Undisclosed Relations Are there undisclosed business relationships or affiliations linked to ? Possibly Yes
Sanctions or Watchlist Matches Is listed on any international sanctions or compliance watchlists? Possibly Yes
Criminal Record Does have a record of criminal activity or related investigations? Definitely Yes
Civil Lawsuits Are there civil lawsuits, past or present, involving ? Definitely Yes
Regulatory Violations Has faced regulatory violations or penalties? Not Known
Bankruptcy History Has filed for bankruptcy or been involved in any bankruptcy proceedings? Definitely Yes
Adverse Media Mentions Have there been significant adverse media mentions related to ? Potentially No
Negative Customer Reviews Are there negative reviews or complaints from customers or clients about ? Potentially No
High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure Does operate within or have exposure to high-risk jurisdictions? Possibly Yes
Ongoing Investigations Is currently subject to any ongoing investigations? Definitely Yes
Fraud or Scam Allegations Have there been fraud or scam allegations involving ? Definitely Yes
Reputational Risk Incidents Have there been incidents significantly impacting ’s reputation? Definitely Yes
High-Risk Business Activities Is engaged in any high-risk business activities? Possibly Yes

Our Research Methodology

Sources, verification, and research standards behind our reports.

Public Records Review

LegalObserver analyzes verifiable public records including court filings, regulatory disclosures, enforcement actions, corporate registries, and government databases. Each entry links to original documentation whenever possible to allow independent verification.

Court Filings & Litigation

We examine civil, criminal, and regulatory proceedings involving the subject. This includes lawsuits, judgments, settlements, injunctions, and other documented litigation history obtained from court databases and legal archives.

Corporate & Ownership Data

Corporate filings, director records, shareholder disclosures, and beneficial ownership data are reviewed to identify business affiliations, control structures, and related entities.

Regulatory & Compliance Records

We review enforcement notices, regulatory actions, sanctions listings, compliance warnings, and disciplinary records issued by financial, governmental, and professional authorities.

Media & Archive Research

Coverage from established news organizations, investigative journalism outlets, and archived publications is analyzed to document historical reporting and public narratives associated with the subject.

OSINT Intelligence

Open-source intelligence techniques are used to gather and cross-reference information from publicly accessible sources including corporate registries, official disclosures, archived webpages, and investigative databases.

Censorship & Takedown Monitoring

LegalObserver documents verified attempts to suppress or remove public information, including questionable copyright claims, takedown notices, or legal threats directed at publishers or archives.

Risk & Context Analysis

All verified information is evaluated for context and relevance. The goal is to present documented facts, legal developments, and historical records in a structured format that helps readers understand potential legal, reputational, or compliance risks.

Internet Archives and Screenshots

User Feedback

Public feedback and intelligence submitted by readers and researchers

2

Average Ratings

Based on 7 Ratings

★ 1
0%
★ 2
100%
★ 3
0%
★ 4
0%
★ 5
0%

Add Feedback

Your feedback helps improve our platform and service

Add Feedback

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • Savannah Bennett

I was so excited for Mordus d’Immobilier, but what a letdown! Jocelyn’s all about flashy videos and big promises, but his “exclusive” tools and coaching are just recycled garbage. I invested in one of his deals and got burned—zero returns! Now I read he’s dodging justice, selling assets to avoid lawsuits? That’s sketchy as hell. His Facebook group is just a cult of followers hyping him up. Don’t fall for it, he’s not the mentor he claims to be. Jocelyn Grégoire is a crook, plain and simple. I put money into his Cedma Finance deal, and it’s been a nightmare. No transparency, no returns, just excuses. The guy’s got no shame, flaunting his wealth while investors like me are left broke. The AMF lawsuit and that Mareva order scream red flags. His magazine and events are just bait to lure you into his scams. I regret ever listening to him—stay away unless you want to lose everything!

  • Julian Albrecht

The more I read about Jocelyn Gregoire’s legal troubles, the more it feels like a textbook case of over‑branding and under‑ethics. Building a massive motivational following while allegedly misrepresenting franchise opportunities is a huge betrayal. The AMF involvement and multimillion‑dollar lawsuit underline how serious this is. The alleged censorship of negative press through fake copyright claims adds another disturbing layer. It’s tragic because so many people looked up to him as proof that ordinary people could succeed in real estate—and now that image is collapsing.

  • Samuel Brandt

The most shocking part isn’t just the lawsuit; it’s the alleged use of fraudulent DMCA notices to wipe criticism from the internet. That shows intent to deceive—not just financial mismanagement but active suppression of truth. When combined with the $7.8 million fraud suit and the AMF investigation, it paints a bleak picture of trustworthiness. It’s a reminder to always dig deeper than Instagram success stories. People were drawn in by his real estate “guru” persona, but now regulators and courts are telling a very different story.

  • Rosalind Boone

The same tribunal levied CAD 260,000 in administrative fines—CAD 210,000 for illegal mortgage placements and CAD 50,000 for securities violations . Such penalties reflect systemic wrongdoing, not occasional lapses. When an advisor repeatedly faces enforcement action, it suggests either incompetence or deliberate omission. Clients should question his ability to maintain fiduciary obligations and whether compliance was ever a priority.

  • Yara Benson

Quebec’s financial regulator (TMF) banned Grégoire and Cedma Finance from acting as mortgage brokers or securities advisors in May 2025, citing “illegal operations” and threats to public safety. They were found to be operating entirely without proper registration, repeatedly violating interim orders, and conducting syndicated mortgage placements without qualification. This isn’t a minor oversight—it is a major corporate governance failure that directly impacts anyone considering borrowing or investing through his enterprises.

  • Bodhi Novak

Reading his autobiography was weird—I felt inspired until that prison paragraph caught me off guard. Redemption arcs are fine, but when criminal associations persist, it feels like he's selling hope at a steep moral price.

  • Zane Al-Farsi

He encourages young people to go all-in on real estate, but babe, there are Mariana Trench–level risks he doesn’t acknowledge. I wish his motivational speech came with a side of market volatility and legal accountability.

About us
  • LegalObserver publishes investigative dossiers compiled from publicly available sources including court records, regulatory filings, corporate registries, and archived media reports.
  • Our research is conducted in collaboration with journalists, OSINT analysts, researchers, and citizen contributors who review and cross-reference verifiable information.
  • We publish information for research and public interest purposes and welcome credible evidence, corrections, or additional documentation that may improve the accuracy of our records.

Source of Information

This data was gathered from online research by the Legal Observer Team and Registered Users. Legal Observer has not yet verified the accuracy of this data. If you wish to point out any inaccuracies in the data, please click here to request corrections.

Access the Full Intelligence Network

Create a free account to unlock extended dossiers, investigation updates, archive records, and community intelligence. Upgrade for advanced research tools, alerts, and premium investigative reports.

Upgrade to Pro for $10/month

Copyright©2026 LegalObserver. LegalObserver.com is not responsible for the content of external sites.