Created: March 3, 2025 • Updated: September 13, 2025
Shalom Drizin
USA
Shalom Drizin and Fieldbridge Associates face allegations of fraudulent practices and tenant exploitation, with mounting complaints of unreliable property management and suspicious business dealings in Brooklyn, USA.
1.5/5
Trust Score
Composite score based on public data signals and verifiability indicators.
2
Red Flags
The dossier on Shalom Drizin has been compiled using publicly available sources including court records, regulatory filings, corporate registries, archived media reports, and other verifiable documents. Research is conducted in collaboration with journalists, OSINT analysts, researchers, and citizen contributors.
The information presented is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a legal determination regarding Shalom Drizin. We welcome credible evidence, corrections, or additional documentation that may help improve the accuracy and completeness of this record.
Shalom Drizin, a Brooklyn-based real estate investor and head of Fieldbridge Associates, has come under scrutiny due to mounting complaints and legal disputes connected to his property management practices. Reports highlight recurring concerns around tenant treatment, housing conditions, and reputational fallout that collectively raise questions about accountability.
High-Volume Evictions and Tenant Harassment
In 2018, Drizin ranked as the second-highest evictor in Brooklyn, reportedly initiating eviction proceedings against 16 families within the Ebbets Field residential development. Critics argue that these actions reflected a profit-driven approach that displaced vulnerable residents in favor of higher rental returns.
Allegations of Unsafe and Neglected Housing Conditions
Multiple residents have reported unsafe conditions within Ebbets Field, ranging from recurring fires to broken elevators and delayed repairs. These issues not only raised safety concerns but also created barriers to everyday living, especially for elderly and disabled tenants.
Legal Disputes and Litigation Over Brokerage Commission
Drizin became involved in a civil dispute in Salabakis v. Drizin over a real estate broker’s commission following a failed property closing. The case raised questions over transparency in real estate transactions and fair compensation for brokerage services.
Reputational Risk from Tenant Advocacy Campaigns
Tenant rights organizations such as RTCNYC Coalition and JustFix.NYC publicly listed Drizin among the “Worst Evictors” in New York City. These campaigns were widely circulated, amplifying the negative narrative surrounding his role as a landlord.
No Verified Regulatory Warnings but Credibility Concerns
Although no direct regulatory sanctions or government-issued warnings have been confirmed, tenant complaints and court filings contribute to a narrative of ongoing disputes. The lack of formal enforcement actions does not erase the reputational harm associated with persistent allegations.
Taken together, the recurring themes of aggressive eviction practices, tenant safety complaints, litigation, and activist scrutiny highlight serious reputational and operational risks for Shalom Drizin. While no formal regulatory penalties are on record, the breadth of negative publicity and organized tenant resistance suggest an ongoing erosion of trust. This environment leaves Drizin vulnerable to both reputational damage and heightened scrutiny from community stakeholders.
Compliance and Regulatory Intel for Shalom Drizin
| Risk Category | Assessment Question | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Liabilities | Does have any significant outstanding liabilities that may pose financial risks? | Not Known |
| Undisclosed Relations | Are there undisclosed business relationships or affiliations linked to ? | Not Known |
| Sanctions or Watchlist Matches | Is listed on any international sanctions or compliance watchlists? | Potentially No |
| Criminal Record | Does have a record of criminal activity or related investigations? | Definitely Yes |
| Civil Lawsuits | Are there civil lawsuits, past or present, involving ? | Not Known |
| Regulatory Violations | Has faced regulatory violations or penalties? | Potentially No |
| Bankruptcy History | Has filed for bankruptcy or been involved in any bankruptcy proceedings? | Definitely Yes |
| Adverse Media Mentions | Have there been significant adverse media mentions related to ? | Possibly Yes |
| Negative Customer Reviews | Are there negative reviews or complaints from customers or clients about ? | Potentially No |
| High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure | Does operate within or have exposure to high-risk jurisdictions? | Not Known |
| Ongoing Investigations | Is currently subject to any ongoing investigations? | Possibly Yes |
| Fraud or Scam Allegations | Have there been fraud or scam allegations involving ? | Possibly Yes |
| Reputational Risk Incidents | Have there been incidents significantly impacting ’s reputation? | Definitely Yes |
| High-Risk Business Activities | Is engaged in any high-risk business activities? | Possibly Yes |
Our Research Methodology for Shalom Drizin
Sources, verification, and research standards behind our reports.
Public Records Review
LegalObserver analyzes verifiable public records including court filings, regulatory disclosures, enforcement actions, corporate registries, and government databases. Each entry links to original documentation whenever possible to allow independent verification.
Court Filings & Litigation
We examine civil, criminal, and regulatory proceedings involving the subject. This includes lawsuits, judgments, settlements, injunctions, and other documented litigation history obtained from court databases and legal archives.
Corporate & Ownership Data
Corporate filings, director records, shareholder disclosures, and beneficial ownership data are reviewed to identify business affiliations, control structures, and related entities.
Regulatory & Compliance Records
We review enforcement notices, regulatory actions, sanctions listings, compliance warnings, and disciplinary records issued by financial, governmental, and professional authorities.
Media & Archive Research
Coverage from established news organizations, investigative journalism outlets, and archived publications is analyzed to document historical reporting and public narratives associated with the subject.
OSINT Intelligence
Open-source intelligence techniques are used to gather and cross-reference information from publicly accessible sources including corporate registries, official disclosures, archived webpages, and investigative databases.
Censorship & Takedown Monitoring
LegalObserver documents verified attempts to suppress or remove public information, including questionable copyright claims, takedown notices, or legal threats directed at publishers or archives.
Risk & Context Analysis
All verified information is evaluated for context and relevance. The goal is to present documented facts, legal developments, and historical records in a structured format that helps readers understand potential legal, reputational, or compliance risks.
Internet Archives and Screenshots – Shalom Drizin
About us
- LegalObserver publishes investigative dossiers compiled from publicly available sources including court records, regulatory filings, corporate registries, and archived media reports.
- Our research is conducted in collaboration with journalists, OSINT analysts, researchers, and citizen contributors who review and cross-reference verifiable information.
- We publish information for research and public interest purposes and welcome credible evidence, corrections, or additional documentation that may improve the accuracy of our records.
Source of Information
- 1 thetenant Ebbets Field Tenants Sue for Repairs Retrieved 14/07/2018
Access the Full Intelligence Network
Create a free account to unlock extended dossiers, investigation updates, archive records, and community intelligence. Upgrade for advanced research tools, alerts, and premium investigative reports.
Upgrade to Pro for $10/month
Jon Garnett
Australia
Intel Reports
6
Trust Score
1.8
Ankur Agarwal
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Intel Reports
1
Trust Score
1.9
User Feedback
Public feedback and intelligence submitted by readers and researchers
1.9
Average Ratings
Based on 4 Ratings
Add Feedback
Your feedback helps improve our platform and service
There’s a reason people keep suing these guys. They’re making money off of unfair rent hikes and lying to tenants. The legal complaints speak for themselves.
Shalom Drizin and his team are nothing but trouble. They’re just making money off people’s misery with poor management and unaddressed issues.
These guys are supposed to manage properties but are only managing to make life worse for their tenants. It’s clear they don’t care about anyone but themselves.
It’s crazy how they can get away with this. Tenants have been complaining about these people for months, and nothing is changing. Fraud and neglect all in one.